
According to the DeWitt Laboratories, Inc. product website, Burn B Gone--currently used by Beverly Hills plastic surgery centers, laser skin resurfacing and hair removal clinics, hospitals, dermatologists and podiatrists--is an advanced hydration gel formula that helps to soothe and revitalizes traumatized skin and dramatically improves scars like no other product in the world.

Burn B Gone devotes an entire page on its website to explaining the global threats to coral reefs. It takes 1756 words to provide a Coral Reef Ecology 101 and fully convey all the miscellaneous human-induced threats. The final 181 words explain how "suntan oils, lotions and products containing sunscreens negatively affect the coral ecosystem because sunscreens cause the rapid and complete bleaching of hard corals, even at extremely low concentrations." Well, actually they have been shown to promote viral growth in the algal symbionts during a limited, clinical laboratory study that resulted in coral bleaching. No trials were conducted in the field in real world settings. But that doesn't matter, because DeWitt Laboratories, Inc. has the solution. Use Burn B Gone. All made available at the remarkable bargain of $34.95 for a 2.5 fl. oz. tube.
I've written here before about how fingers have pointed at bather's pee and too much sunscreen use as potential threats to coral health. Until the recent published study on sunscreens and coral bleaching, these have always existed in the category of perceived threats. But even with the published study, every coral reef destination visited by peeing, sunscreen-wearing tourists is a unique case. It seems too easy to fall prey of the logical fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc.
Many factors contribute to making an easy answer of positive correlation difficult. A few of these might include volume and frequency of human traffic, amount of snorkelers wearing sunblock, physical parameters of the destination (embayment, open water, shallow, deep, etc.) and degree of wave action and oceanic circulation in the site. Finally, what sort of equation or methodology do you use to estimate how many snorkelers or divers are actually shedding sunscreen? As I mentioned previously, I've yet to find a study that addresses the sunscreen issue from such a controlled approach in the field. If readers know of any, I'm all ears.

Hat tip to Liz for the heads-up on this.
4 comments:
How is it that Burn-B-Gone is safe for corals? Has it been tested? Their claims seem rather outrageous. Perhaps I am more skeptical (and cynical) than most, but I'm not buying it (the product or their claims)
You'd think that some of these companies would be a little leary about promoting a product as a cure-all after the Airborne marketing disaster. I can't seem to find a list of their ingredients either (trade secret, I'm sure)
There's also Beach Buff, which also goes into a lengthy statement about why their product is reef safe and how they've conducted testing as well. Hawaiian Blend, distributed from Kailua-Kona has similar ingredients to Beach Buff, but do not make the claim of being reef safe. It is listed in their FAQ's, but they choose not to promote it in this manner (good business sense).
I too am highly skeptical of the recent study conducted, and am afraid of those who will take it as gospel and plan an all out assault on visitors wearing sunscreen. You'll never get all visitors to wear rashguards, who come to sunny places like Hawai'i for a once-in-a-lifetime vacation to enjoy the sun and water on their bare skin. Besides, people will still be putting sunscreen on their faces, necks and legs! Common sense should prevail here-
jim...
yeah, no clue on the trials they performed to determine how polyp-safe their product is...
jill...
i too am curious to see an ingredient list... do you think maybe its active ingredient is "love" and "hope" in a mineral oil base? the idea that people will slather on an (expensive) product thinking it's coral safe (when the evidence for this claim is still lacking) is indeed worrisome...
yeah, rash guards will appeal to the younger/beach wear/surfer wanna be visitors... maybe the older, carcinoma-wary visitors, but i don't see their use suddenly sky rocketing...
and you raise a point about face, legs, etc... people will still want their holiday tans, yet want SOME degree of sun protection...
what do you think is a reasonable management approach to something like this?
Well, one thing we're looking into is working with our partners who currently educate cruise ship passengers. One of our partners has naturalists on the shuttles and we may at least see if we can get some samples of waterproof sunscreen, educate people about the importance of applying at least 30 minutes before entering the water (to protect them as well as corals). Also, our other partners will have a table where the passengers disembark.
Another option is with hotels, perhaps seeing if they can work a few sentences into their presentations they give on sights. You have to reach people before they reach the site!
Post a Comment