As you might surmise given the terrible state of coral reefs these days, artificial reefs are big news and could potentially become big business. While not technically illustrating an artificial reef, The Other 95% newbie Mike Haubrich recently wrote a post about the BioRock process of electro-accretion as a means of stimulating new coral growth. I'll withhold my comments on the BioRock process for this post, but suffice to say I wouldn't advise anyone cashing-out their 401K plans to invest in the process in the near future. Again, a story for another day.
The artificial reef landscape is studded with assorted ventures and approaches. There's everything from low tech rock or coral rubble mounds as reef growing surface to medium tech methods such as sinking old ships and wrecks or employing permanent artificial reef structures called Reef Balls to high tech approaches such as electro-mineral accretion. All have their strengths and limitations. Personally, I like working to keep natural reefs alive and healthy. But sometimes circumstances may call for more aggressive recovery methods. Such is the case with certain unsustainable fishing practices on coral reefs.
Dynamite fishing, or blast fishing, is a profound and widespread threat to coral reefs throughout the Indo-Pacific. Though generally illegal, it is practiced in more than thirty countries. The basic idea is that a small bottle (often a beer or Coka-Cola bottle) is filled with gunpowder, fitted with a fuse, lit, then dropped onto a shallow reef area. The resultant explosion stuns or kills fish and makes them easy to collect. I've been underwater in areas of Papua New Guinea and Indonesia and have heard the thud of bottle bombs igniting from miles away. I've also visited the blast sites from former fishing areas. Where once lush coral growth existed, only rubble and empty holes remain.Blast fishing kills fish indiscriminately and pulverizes living coral to particle or grain-sized fragments. Repeated blasting creates vast deserts of loose coral rubble that shifts easily in current flow creating unsuitable settling surface for coral larvae. Lacking suitable habitat, reef fish quickly abandon a demolished reef and local fisheries collapse.
Large blasted areas are slow to recover because coral planula larvae have difficulty establishing on loose or sandy substrate. Young corals that successfully settle easily topple-over on the unstable substrate or quickly become smothered by sand or algae. Recent studies by Helen Fox and Roy Caldwell at UC Berkeley Dept. of Integrative Bio have referred to frequently blasted areas as “killing fields” for new coral recruits and indicate that if recovery is even possible it can take more than a century for a reef to rebound by natural means once the live coral cover has been destroyed.Enter the EcoReefs approach. Founded in 2001, by Dr. Michael Moore, Ecoreefs are designed to be a large-scale, ecologically significant intervention for use in coral reef areas where the natural coral growth has suffered significant damage or loss, such as from dynamite fishing. EcoReefs are constructed out of a white ceramic, a lot like an unglazed toilet. About a meter across and weighing close to 50 pounds, their form was inspired by the shape of staghorn coral. The idea behind their development was to provide a non-reactive, stable, porous surface for larval coral to settle upon. Anchor enough of them in the loose rubble of a previously blasted areas, the theory goes, and a new reef will eventually take root on the welcoming arms of the EcoReef module.
So how are things working out? You have to see to believe. In one study site in the Indonesian marine protected area of Bunaken National Park, Moore and Seacology installed 620 EcoReef modules in an enormous array. Even at its earliest stage before coral or fish return, a large EcoReefs array is an impressive sight. The 3-dimensional modules immediately create complex reef-like habitat over large areas. And what I particularly love about Michael's approach is that it isn't just a swarm of scientists descending on a site to salvage the reef. Instead, he and Seacology engage local communities to take ownership in the reef rehabilitation. Sure, some of these folks may have also been responsible for the blast fishing in the first place. But for communities to reduce or eliminate unsustainable practices, conservationists have to be willing to engage them in a learning process.
Only a few weeks after being submerged, the white surfaces of the EcoReef modules darken with a film of diatoms and algae. Eventually, corraline red algae begins to grow across the surface. Within months, reef fish return to live among the branching arms of the modules. And in as little as two years, coral recruits and sponges can be seen growing on the module surfaces. One of the techniques used to jump-start growth on the EcoReefs is "coral transplants." Chunks of loose, living coral were physically attached to the EcoReefs with small plastic ties. Oddly, those transplant modules have done no better than the ones left to their own devices. 


It's estimated that EcoReefs can shorten recovery times of heavily-blasted reefs to perhaps as little as 7 to 15 years. Natural recovery time for badly damaged coral reefs are long -- on the order of 50 to 100 years or more. While not that long in the scale of earth time, certainly a longer recovery process than most people will witness in their own lives.
Moore currently has EcoReefs arrays deployed throughout Indonesia and the Philippines (areas with some of the most intensive blast fishing activity). If the arrays continue to demonstrate encouraging results, their utility may spread to other areas where reefs have suffered large scale damage from human activity or even severe storm damage. Simply planting EcoReefs arrays alone, however, won't be enough. Artificial reefs, either sunken ships or EcoReefs modules, attract fish. And fish attract fishers. Effective marine resource management, including regulations and enforcement, is needed to ensure that long-term reef rehabilitation efforts aren't undermined by short-term profit.
I get a lot of compliments on my "artsy" coffee table. I'm happy, in this case, that art imitates life.










6 comments:
We're actually using Reef Balls here at RWU in Mount Hope Bay for oyster and fin fish (and any other critter that comes along) restoration. In fact one of our students is giving a presentation on this work this week at the Benthic Ecology meeting.
I agree though - better to protect than repair. And if we're going to repair, we better protect.
What a cool post. Warms my ecological restorationist heart.
Great post Rick! I am wondering if you have seen any indication that locals see this as a fix to the damage they have done, so that they can continue doing similar damage but know that there is fix... Do you know get what I mean?
Also, are locals from these fishing villages involved in the restoration and maintenance of this project? i.e. when you say "...engage local communities to take ownership in the reef rehabilitation..." does that translate into income so they do not have to do these destructive practices any longer?
Thanks for the link, and I am also curious if the local ecnomomy will be able to take advantage of this in some way (other than using the system as a way to rebuild a vanishing fishery.)
bunaken national park, highlighted in my post, is an interesting and somewhat illustrative case... as i've said here before, resource management is more about managing people than it is about managing the resource...
areas of the bunaken reef had been bombed in the 1970s... but by 2000 (when Mike Moore installed his first arrays), the reef had not yet recovered and fish were not returning... villagers didn't understand why this was so... the reason is that reefs are bombed where there are the most fish--and fish are attracted to a strong current... but that current also makes it hard for corals to grow back....
villagers asked for help rehabilitating the area... conservationists were excited to help, but communities were asked to agree to learn some basic coral reef ecology, coral threats, and how to protect their reefs over time...
when moore began the project, everyone, from little kids to grandparents, helped out... once installed, the EcoReefs belong to everyone, and local communities make agreements to take care to see that no one is fishing in the no-take zones within the park... modules are checked by villagers at least twice a week...
the terms of the agreement require villagers to wait five years before fishing on the artificial reefs again, but villagers are unlikely to start so soon... and certainly, fishing must be done so in a sustainable manner...
so where can communities earn a living while their reefs recover? tourism plays an important part here...
i only have visitation numbers from 2003, but about 40,000 guests visited Bunaken, each paying a modest entrance fee (about $18 US)... this generated more than a billion rupiah (over $100,000) in revenue... 80% of this goes to park management, which includes boat patrols of protected areas, moorings, salaries, and a fund shared by the 31 villages within the park... the rest goes to Jakarta...
it may not sound like much, but remember this is indonesia and the dollar goes far...
in addition to tourism, other alternative livelihoods are being explored (sustainable aquaculture, handicrafts, as well as microenterprises)...
as far as enforcement is concerned, if convicted of poaching or blast fishing in the future, the offenders may face 10 years in prison, or a 500 million rupiah ($50,000) fine...
you might ask if this is an excessive punishment, in a country where the average salary is about $1,000 a year...
a bunaken park manager was quoted in a 2005 interview as saying, "Everyone who lives here knows the law. When people commit a first offence we give them a warning, and try to teach them why preserving the reefs and forests is important. On a second offense, they are fined."
and like i reported before about the fiji rugby team, it's important to offer carrots as well as the stick in management... if we can incentivize conservation and protection, get communities to see tangible benefits from protection, we don't have to work as hard at threats of punishments...
We found this via Google... what a great post.
The table may be nice, but it's even better to see a natural shape being used to establish reefs. Cars, Ships, and large domes do work, but this seems like a much improved method.
Post a Comment