Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Not A Creature Was Stirring

Well, that's not entirely correct. While the CORAL offices are empty and staff scattered to the winds for the holidays, I'm here stirring my second cup of coffee and trying to bring form and meaning to an article I'm hoping to publish in the new year. My editors have kindly given me an extension till end of day today, so it's easier to work on this at the office with zero distractions than at home where all I can think about is honey-baked ham.

While I've poked my head up for a breather, I wanted to share news of an important report that was released in November that for the life of me I couldn't get around to blogging about. The Healthy Reefs for Healthy People initiative released the first Eco-health Report Card for the Mesoamerican Reef on November 15. The Report Card presents an easy-to-understand overview of the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef’s ecosystem condition and stewardship by providing a straightforward five-point grading system from ‘very good’ to ‘critical’ for seven reef indicators, combined into a novel Integrated Reef Health Index which synthesizes all the ecological reef data into one “Dow Jones” style index.

So what sort of grades does the Mesoamerican Reef--stretching over 1,000 km from Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula, through the entire Belize Barrier Reef complex, along the coast of Guatemala and out to the Bay Islands of Honduras--get? This first Report Card shows the overall picture of a reef in danger, in need of immediate protection. Many of the reef health indicators (particularly for fish abundances) are now in worse condition than the Caribbean average and threats like coastal development and tourism are rapidly accelerating.

Now I ask you (since we are using the "report card" analogy), if your kids came home with report cards that demonstrated poor performance (and not just poor performance, but performance demonstrably worse than the last reporting cycle), wouldn't you take action? I don't even have kids (nor even want any) but I can assure you my reaction to such a scenario would hardly be sanguine. And yet we continue to hear such fair to poor prognoses for reefs. This summer I made precisely this point at the US Coral reef Task Force meeting in Kona when a then freshly released NOAA report indicated that half of all US coral reefs are in poor to fair condition, with one-third of all reefs facing extinction.

Poor grades on a student report card might have this non-parent looking at degrees of culpability from several possible causes. First, in an act of sheer paternalism, I might consider there's nothing wrong with my child. Instead, there must be something wrong with the teacher. Perhaps this steward of my child's mind is slacking in their responsibilities.

Second, I'd have to consider the failing student. What's happening in that child's attitude, life, or environment to not only allow for academic failure, but create a downward trend over time.

And finally, I'd need to consider my role and responsibility as a parent. If failing grades come as a surprise, where was I during the process? Failing grades on a report card don't just happen. They are the aggregate scores following multiple opportunities to measure progress, make course corrections, and build towards success. So for a failure to catch me by surprise, I'd really need to have been "checked-out" of my role as parent/guardian.

I may have stretched this analogy to it's breaking point, but there is nonetheless a point I'm hoping to make. Whether we talk about failing grades in school or failing grades on an ecological report card, a failing grade is not a prediction of future grades or ultimate outcome (either of a student or an ecosystem). It is certainly a warning sign, and if the overall trend in performance is a downward slide, then urgent action must be taken. But inaction, disinterest, or finger-pointing should be nowhere to be found in our repertoire of possible reactions to failure.

"Sorry Timmy, you are failing and will always fail. Time to cut my losses and focus on Briana." The idea of such a response to a failing child gives me goosebumps, and not just because it's Christmas Eve. And I've certainly heard the horror stories of parent friends who have been locked in blame game shouting matches between teachers, students, and parents over who's ultimately responsible for poor student performance.

In my world of coral reef conservation, the players may be different but the dynamics are roughly the same. Who's to blame for a declining coral reef? It's the resource managers! It's the tourists! It's the fishers! It's the developers! It's the normal reef cycle! It's global warming! It's the policy makers! The blame goes around, the reef health declines.

Dr. Melanie McField, Healthy Reefs Initiative Coordinator (and friend and colleague), provided some context to the Meoamerican Report Card saying that, “While the picture could certainly be worse, the report card signals the urgency for stronger actions to protect our reefs." “With so many reefs in fair to poor condition," she said, "their condition could easily turn in either direction (for better or worse) depending on our current management actions. We need to do the right thing for the reefs and for the people who depend on those reefs to sustain their livelihoods”.

Hear-Hear, Melanie! Hear-Hear!

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

I'm Booked, Baby!

Start fermenting a batch of Aquavit, Zelnio! Hold on to your kreplach, Goldstein! Start polishing your head, McClain! And get ready to toast Darwin's 200th birthday early, James! I finally booked my travel for the ScienceOnline'09 science blogging conference that's rapidly approaching on January 16-18 in Raleigh-Durham.

Why am I excited? Many reasons, not the least of which is that this is my best chance each year to see many of my favorite ocean bloggers face-to-face. There's word of a planned evening (or two?) involving festive (and likely inebriated) ocean nerds singing sea shanties. Über geek Karen James even claims to have a binder of said tunes! Since she's coming from the UK, I can only hope they feature bawdy and ribald lyrics.

If I can still manage to get my co-presenters to show-up, I'm excited to be organizing a panel discussion on the final day of the conference entitled, Hey, You Can’t Say That! We'll be exploring some of the peaks and valleys of free expression in the science blogging community. I know I'm looking forward to learning as much as sharing. I'm hoping that Mark Powell, ocean blogging royalty and the deranged Michael Phelps of frigid ocean swimming, is gonna make an appearance this year too.

I'll also be participating in another panel entitled, Blogging Adventure: How to Post from Strange Locations, which could very well be the unofficial second title to this blog. One of my favorite science bloggers, Vanessa Woods, is also co-presenting on that topic and I'm looking forward to chatting her up about her work with bonobo.

Expect plenty of live-blogging, fun pictures, and unexpurgated reviews of sessions. I can't wait!

Monday, December 15, 2008

That's A Moray Monday: A Bonaire Update


Last week on Shifting Baselines, Randy Olson posted some recent statistics of moray eel mortalities on the Island of Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles. This was an update on a story I first reported while on Bonaire last September. Randy also posted a YouTube video of a Bonaire eel in apparent death throes. Snooping around YouTube, I also found the above video showing a graphic example of a Spotted moray undergoing convulsions and biting it's own abdomen.

Randy's post was a catalyst for me to reach out to a few Bonaire colleagues for new info. According to the Marine Park, a final epidemiological report is nearing completion and the scientist compiling the report in San Juan, Puerto Rico, feels confident that he may not just identify the culprit but may even have enough evidence to suggest what started these events. As I hear news I'll certainly share findings here.

A naturalist friend on Bonaire, Jerry Ligon, forwarded a presentation that was given to the public a week ago which provides a summary of info so far collected. The data was compiled and presented by Kara Kozak from Simmons College who is on island and participating in the CIEE Tropical Marine Ecology and Conservation Program.

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Cool? No. Nerd? Definitely!


I'm not one for self-promotion. I'm more of a behind-the-scenes sort of guy. So imagine my quandary when I was contacted recently by Annie Crawley, creator of the ocean education website Dive Into Your Imagination, for inclusion in her Cool Scientists You Should Know series.

Scientist? Yes. Ocean lover? Absolutely. But cool? Not by any stretch of the imagination. I've never worn a leather jacket, slicked my hair (what hair?), nor ridden a motorcycle (or Jet Ski for that matter). When I think cool, I think George Clooney and Ocean's 11. Anyone who knows me can vouch that I'm much more comfortable and happy talking about major evolutionary marine faunas through time, researching novel proteins present in cnidarian venom, and discussing the distinctions between customary marine tenure across Oceania.

But I can understand for marketing reasons why the series might not be called Big Ocean Science Geeks You've Never Heard Of.

In any event, I'm utterly flattered and felt the urge to share (if only to show my brothers that I actually have a day job).

Coral Reef Alliance Supports A Proposed Mariana Trench Monument

You can too!

I'm proud to say that CORAL is joining a chorus of other international voices in support for the proposed Mariana Trench Marine National Monument. We are encouraging our members, partners, and friends to urge President Bush to follow the bold precedent he set when he created the Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument in Hawaii in 2006. This is an unparalleled opportunity to protect a diversity of interconnected oceanic habitats including tropical coral reefs, seamounts, and deep canyons. In so doing, President Bush would establish one of the world's largest no-take marine reserves in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and truly affirm his legacy as an ocean champion.

But we need your voice to join in support as well by sending an email to President Bush today.

You can write your own message or copy and paste the following letter into an email addressed to President George W. Bush and send it to comments@whitehouse.gov:
President George W. Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20050

Dear President Bush,

I'm writing today to show my support for designating a Mariana Trench Marine National Monument. I urge you to conserve this valuable ecosystem with full protection for the unique geological and biological features of the area, including (1) designating the area as a no-take zone and (2) extending the boundaries of the monument to the limits of the Exclusive Economic Zone around the three northern islands, including the submerged lands, the water column, and the biological life.

There are precious few marine areas on the planet where extraction is now prohibited. It would be a missed opportunity to recognize this very remote site with only half-measures. Closing the monument waters to all extraction will have no negative economic impact on the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. In fact, designating this area as a no-take zone will enhance tourism and help the commonwealth economically.

The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands represents an attractive opportunity for establishing one of the world's largest no-take marine reserves. It is a highly unique area adjacent to the deepest undersea canyon on the globe with an enormous variety of unusual habitats.I urge you to follow the bold precedent you set when you created the Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument in 2006. Setting aside an entire ocean ecosystem will capture the world's imagination-and confirm the United States as the global leader in marine protection.

Thank you,

[Sign your name, or remain anonymous if you choose.]

The Madness Of King Tides?

Since more than half of the conservation projects I oversee are scattered across the Pacific Rim, I tend to stay up late (sometimes into the early morning hours) to read the news across several time zones (and dates). I was alarmed to read the news reports this morning from Papua New Guinea (PNG) about unusually high tides wreaking havoc in New Ireland Province. According to several sources, more than 25,000 people from New Ireland Province and Bougainville have been driven from their homes by the high tides since Tuesday.

What struck me as puzzling, however, was that almost every report attributed the damage to what they called "king tides." "Huge waves caused by king tides smashed into dozens of villages and towns in northern Papua New Guinea, destroying homes and flooding businesses and a hospital," writes the New Zealand online news outlet Stuff. Australia Broadcasting News reports, "A relief operation is slowly taking shape in Papua New Guinea's New Ireland province to help thousands of people displaced by huge king tides that struck the island two days ago." And Radio New Zealand has several stories under headlines that read, "King tides hit PNG’s Gulf province."

So what's a king tide? I Googled the term and found that Wikipedia describes a king tide as a name given to exceptionally high tides. Well, okay. But I always referred to the monthly highest of the high and lowest of the low tides as spring tides (having nothing at all to do with the season). These are the tidal cycles (during new and full moons) that result when the Sun, Earth and Moon are in a line.

But these are monthly occurrences. If king tides are spring tides, why are PNG tides so violent and destructive now rather than as a monthly phenomenon? Is there something else going on with a king tide?

According to the Queensland Government Maritime Safety website, the term king tide has no scientific definition although in popular usage it refers to any high tide well above average height. The popular concept, however, is that king tides are the annual highest of the monthly high tide occurrences (or the annual highest of the monthly spring tides). In the Pacific basin where PNG is located, this annual highest of the high tides tends to occur around Christmas time.

What now appears to be behind the destructive PNG is not actually a king tide but a particularly strong storm surge. As reported in The National, one of PNG's daily newspapers, "The National Weather Service said the sea swell was not the result of a king tide but a product of the “La Niña” (wet weather) pattern PNG is experiencing."

According to the PNG National Weather Service, accumulation of high sea levels is typical during La Niña events. No seismic activity and no tsunami activity could account for the destructive sea swell. Manasupe Zurenuoc, chairman of the PNG National Disaster Committee and Secretary for Department of Provincial and Local Government Affairs, explained that the unusually high seas were a result of a combination of abnormally high sea levels and tropical depressions. Pacific Magazine and the PNG Post-Courier appear to corroborate this explanation with a headline that reads, "Weather, Not 'King Tide,' Caused PNG Wave Destruction."

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Two People Who Don't Understand the Power of Television in America

The Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network, a global alliance of partners involved in collecting ecological and socioeconomic data to track trends in coral reef health, today released their much anticipated 2008 update of the world’s reef status. Their findings were announced today by the Director General of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

In case you missed the live announcement, fear not. It was taped, uploaded to YouTube, and can be viewed above. All I can say is that if we are relying on these distinguished spokespeople to generate a sense of urgency, then coral reefs are indeed doomed.

The report's findings are no great surprise to the coral reef scientific and conservation communities: if current trends in carbon dioxide emissions continue, many of the remaining reefs may be lost over the next 20 to 40 years. This will have alarming consequences for some 500 million people who depend on coral reefs for their livelihoods.

Globally, the downward trend in reef health of recent years has not been reversed. Major threats in the last four years, including the Indian Ocean tsunami, more occurrences of bleaching, outbreaks of coral diseases and ever-heavier human pressures, have slowed or reversed recovery of some coral reefs after the 1998 mass bleaching event.

Clive Wilkinson, my colleague in coral reef conservation and Coordinator of the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network says that, “The report details the strong scientific consensus that climate change must be limited to the absolute minimum. If nothing is done to substantially cut emissions, we could effectively lose coral reefs as we know them, with major coral extinctions."

Bush Administration Gets Fitted For New Suit

Here in the 600 block of California Street in San Francisco's Financial District, our offices share floors with conservation neighbors the Center for Biological Diversity.

I've been a huge fan of the Center even before we were neighbors. Their mission is to use science, legal expertise, and media attention to protect endangered species and ecosystems. While they utilize a diverse arsenal of approaches, you may know them as the "environmental lawsuit people." And perhaps rightly so. A snapshot of their personnel shows a brain trust of talented, aggressive attorneys who have chosen to eschew partnerships, fat salaries, and exorbitant compensation packages at private law firms in favor of fighting for a healthy planet. As a result, the Center boasts an impressive record of 93 percent favorable outcomes on their lawsuits.

But a recent announcement by the Center of their intention to file a suit against the Bush administration for failure to protect endangered coral reefs might, at first blush, leave you scratching your head. On November 26, 2008, NOAA announced that it will designate almost 3,000 square miles of coral reef area off the coasts of Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands as critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act. The new rule, published in the Federal Register, was required by a court-approved settlement of a 2007 lawsuit brought by the Center for Biological Diversity.

Shouldn't the Center be celebrating? Have they gone sue crazy?

Well, take a closer look. The Endangered Species Act requires that when a species is listed under the Act, the federal government must protect habitat that is essential to its survival and recovery. Thanks to efforts by the Center for Biological Diversity, Elkhorn coral (Acropora palmata) and Staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis) were listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 2006. In the new critical-habitat rule, the federal government designated important areas to be protected for the corals, but created a giant loophole that disregards the primary threats to coral habitat: elevated seawater temperatures and ocean acidification.

Miyoko Sakashita, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity, explains that, "On one hand, the law required the federal government to identify areas to protect for the threatened corals. On the other hand, the administration skirted the real threats to coral habitat, global warming and ocean acidification, by inserting language into the rule that carves out an exception for those threats. It is not only irrational, but it is illegal under the Endangered Species Act.”

You've heard me go on at length before about once magestic stands of Caribbean Elkhorn and Staghorn corals that have been reduced to shadows of their former glory due to a combination of diseases and elevated sea surface temperatures. But I've also outlined the emerging issue of ocean acidification, a concomitant byproduct of global warming caused by the ocean’s absorption of carbon dioxide that impairs the ability of corals to build their protective skeletons. Some scientists have predicted that most of the world’s coral reefs will disappear by midcentury due to global warming and ocean acidification under a business-as-usual emissions scenario.

What the Center's intended suit seeks from the Administration is language that sets substantial reductions in carbon dioxide pollution, the ultimate cause behind coral habitat destruction. The Center for Biological Diversity filed an official 60-day notice letter to the Bush administration on November 25 outlining their intent to sue over the Administration’s inadequate critical-habitat rule.

Burn With Envy, DSN Guys!

What's 250 feet in length, packs state of the art technology, has a cruising speed of 25 knots, and is guaranteed to make the boys at Deep Sea News wet themselves in awe?

I give you the Oculus, the crown jewel in design concept from luxury mega yacht manufacturer Schöpfer Yachts. Don't get too excited yet. It's still just concept, but the CGI overview is certainly pretty! The bio-engineered Oculus, designed to accommodate 12 guests in extraordinary comfort and style, features a 12 foot high ceiling in the main salon, a cylindrical double height dining room, central stair and (of course) an elevator tube.

As an ocean scientist, I can honestly tell you that deploying and hauling-in equipment like secchi disks or plankton tows on conventional vessels is a royal pain. All that pesky distance before my instruments actually touch water!

But no more. With its revolutionary “low rider profile,” the Oculus is simply perfect for accommodating a crew of oceanographers. And when surveys are through and seas get rough, a push of a button activates lateral retractable side panels that close for a watertight seal.

While I'm sure Craig wants first dibs on one of these puppies, I'll happily settle for a six-month berth in the third level aft private salon in exchange for offering an evening seminar series on coral reefs. Schöpfer Yachts? Feel free to ring me.

Tuesday, December 09, 2008

Excuses Are For Sucka's

I've been out of the blogging life for so long, I needed to relearn how to use a keyboard again. Q-W-E-R-T-Y... ahh, it's all coming back.

No excuses for you, my dear, loyal, faithful, understanding reader (and I do mean singular reader at this point!) All I can do is come back with a bang. To wit: Nothing at all to do with oceans I'm afraid, but hopefully it makes you smile.